0 Cart
0 Add all flipped products to cart Flipped
02.10.2024

Adapting to change: A reflection on fashion, marriage, and gender roles

A reader shares on the drastic transformations in fashion, marriage, and women’s roles from the 1950s to 2024. Explore why convenience shapes modern trends and why adapting to change is essential in today’s world.

While formal clothing was already in decline in the years before the pandemic, working from home has accelerated the trend, and in the office smart casual rules.

Oliver Cheshire in Hardy Amies, Jon Hamm as Mad Men’s Don Draper, and a suit from M&S. Composite: Getty/AMC/M&S


Question from Mr. Amin:

Good afternoon to the GC team,

I read your articles and I very much agree that fashion has significantly changed a lot over the past decades and so are people, technology and so on. Our perception of things 10 years ago and today are also different due to new information that we receive. I notice that when our environment changes, we are forced to adapt regardless, good or bad. Because if we don't adapt, we will be lost behind. People would see us as backward thinking. 

1. Fashion

Let's draw our attention to fashion. I think you would agree with me that fashion in the 50s is better than the fashion today. Men were dressing like men. Women were dressing like women. Folks were dressed accordingly because they took pride in their appearances. We were in a golden age of civility and rectitude. For unknown reasons society changed. From a dark three piece suit to shorts and croc slippers for men. While the women went from cocktail dress to wearing men's clothes just to enforce gender equality. So who is responsible for this change? The fashion designer? If you send me a fashion in the 40s or 50s or 60s, I can tell that the fashions in those eras were significantly better than the fashion today. So if fashion in those eras were better, why do people want to change? 

Convenience.

That is what destroys things, even good things. Simple example, in the 60s shirts were tighter and neatly tucked in. In 2024, you get mocked (example nerd) for tucking in your shirt even if it is a good thing. Tucking in makes you look neat and smart but society doesn't do it anymore. People are willing to look sloppy because of convenience (relaxed). 

Take a look at our Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's government today. They practice "dress down". They no longer wear neck ties for official duties. They impose us to follow. It is this type of culture that sets the wrong precedence. We have lost a lot of good fashion. Now, they want to further destroy fashion by getting rid of the tie. We should be dressing sharply, not bluntly.  

Again convenience. The lesser the effort is, the better. That is the message here.

2. Marriage

Who knew divorce would be the in-thing in 2024. Divorce means nothing anymore today as many people seek solace in singlehood. With the volume of marriage complaints that I see on your page and divorce being most talked about, you can't deny that divorce is no longer a taboo as it once was. You can already read many news articles that point to the rising number of singles. It is easier to manage a single life. Far less commitments means less headache. Marriage requires a lot of money. Inflation keeps rising. Men can't keep up so they take up personal loans. I have acquaintances who take up a loan to pay off another loan and they are very unhappy with their marriage. That is how depressing their situation is. So why bother marrying when you can be free of depths right? Why get married when you can remain single and keep going out with many girls right? My own circle of friends are in a state of depression trying to sustain their marriage. They even used up all their savings and are now begging friends to borrow some money. It's so sad to see their situation. I am 47 years old and I don't want to get married because I know I cannot sustain. Everyone knows marriage is actually a good phase in life, it teaches you to be responsible, it teaches us to be a real man but articles and news seem to show that people prefer the single life. 

Again convenience and freedom play a role.

3.  Evolution of Women

Women are not the same as they were in the 50's. The role especially women have gone through a remarkable transformation over the centuries. 

Women were more confined to domestic roles but today their status has raised significantly in modern times. They are able to gain financial independence, and actively contribute to society. They have a demand in a relationship. They want convenience (money). If they don't get it, they will show the man the door. Women as men, also do not care about getting married. They have their own income. But we men would still need to pay for them. Most times a woman's money is their own. They rarely buy for you unless it's for a special occasion. Women are aware of their traits as a lady to be more reserved, refined and well-spoken but many of them no longer adhere to those traits. They don't want to abide by such decorum and taste. They want to feel loose - not tied to any boundaries or rules (again convenient) yet they have high demands like for instance they want their own house in their own choice of location. The women of yesterday would never demand a man to stay at a location of her choice. It's usually the man's choice. They choose a man based on their level of convenience. 

Personally, I think there would come a time that requires all of us to embrace these changes. We can't change fashion back to its glory era of the 50's. We already cannot control divorce rates from skyrocketing. We can't change women to be who they were in the 50's. These are some examples I have brought up to show that despite wanting things to be as they once were......despite listing all the advantages these things have,  we just can't change them but to move forward and accept these changes in life. It's either we adapt or we lose. 

Answer by The Gentleman:

Hi Mr. Amin,

Thank you for your thoughtful and deeply engaging letter. Your observations about the shifts in fashion, gender roles, and societal values resonate strongly with the themes we've explored at GC, and I appreciate your reflection on how convenience has influenced many of these changes.

Indeed, the 1960s marked a pivotal moment in the evolution of what it means to be a gentleman and how fashion reflects that. It was, as you pointed out, a golden age of genteel culture, particularly under figures like President John F. Kennedy in the United States, Tunku Abdul Rahman and P. Ramlee in Malaysia. These men were not only political and cultural leaders but also symbols of masculine elegance, each representing a distinctive style that transcended mere clothing to embody leadership and elegance. The suit became synonymous with this gentlemanly image—polished, refined, and always purposeful.

However, in our view, the societal upheavals of the 1960s were catalysts for change. In the West, the Vietnam War, the rise of countercultural movements, and the assassination of the American royalty (JFK in 1963, and RFK in 1969) challenged not only the notion of authority but also the very image of masculinity. In response, fashion began to shift toward convenience, informality, and a rejection of the rigid codes of the past. Similarly, the magazine Gentleman's Quarterly recognized this cultural shift, and in 1957, its rebranding to GQ signaled the move toward a new kind of masculinity—one that allowed for greater fluidity and adaptability, much like society itself.

In Malaysia, Tunku Abdul Rahman and P. Ramlee were champions of gentlemanly elegance, blending Western influence with local cultural identity. Their sartorial choices were sharp and dignified, embodying the same ideals of rectitude and grace. But then, the Tunku resigned as Prime Minister in 1970 amid strong opposition from the 'Young Turks' who were party opponents such as Mahathir Mohamad and Musa Hitam. Meanwhile, P. Ramlee passed away in 1973. Ever since, "bangsawan" lifestyle (or the west called "old money style") began to gradually decline. The formality of suits and ties gave way to more relaxed styles, especially in response to the changing economic and social landscape.

There are dozens of other theories on why the dress-up culture has died in 2024, ones that are often less convincing and more argumentative. Some say people are lazy and lack personal pride. Others say the availability of cheap clothing has crowded out the market for quality tailoring. The worst takes are the ones that link the decline of tailoring to Western civilization itself – as the suit has declined, so has morality and virtue. These are about as bad as people who base their conception of the 1950s off film noir.

As you pointed out, this trend of "dressing down" has permeated even the highest levels of authority, with today's leaders opting for a more casual approach in line with modern values of accessibility and relatability. While this shift toward convenience might seem like a loss of refinement, it’s also a reflection of society's evolving needs. Dressing sharply, as you eloquently put it, is about making an effort, and that effort—while perhaps less common today—still holds value.

Your concerns about how convenience has influenced not just fashion but relationships and societal roles are well-founded. The same forces driving fashion trends—ease, flexibility, and freedom—have impacted the institution of marriage and gender dynamics. In a world where both men and women are grappling with new expectations, these conveniences have become a double-edged sword. Yes, they offer freedom, but they also come with a loss of certain traditions and commitments that once defined these roles.

At GC, we believe in embracing change while holding onto the values that made the gentleman of the past an aspirational figure. Being a gentleman today may not look exactly as it did in the 1950s or 60s, but the core principles of honor, respect, and elegance remain. It’s about adapting these values to the world we live in, much like how fashion adapts to the times. We can still dress sharply and behave with decorum, even as we navigate a more casual world.

It’s sad that it’s harder and harder to wear a suit and tie these days, but you can still get away with more dressier ethos of dressing (such as wearing a pocket square, wearing a leather dress shoes with socks, or layering for casual dress code), if you’re willing to look a bit more dressed up than most. And on balance, the world has gotten better with each passing generation, even if they’re dressed more casually. That’s the kind of optimism and democratic ethos that we think defines the better parts of the world today.

Thank you again for your thoughtful letter. We look forward to continuing this important conversation on the evolution of gentlemanly living.

 

With gratitude and respect,

The Gentleman

 

READ MORE: The dapper & socialite gent: Lessons from Tunku Abdul Rahman
READ MORE: Elderly reader reflects on societal influence on dressing well and values

 

Gentlemen's Code has your back! We're thrilled to announce our brand new section on our website: "Ask the Gentleman". Submit your burning questions on all things relationships, culture, style, and etiquette by emailing to: editor@gentlemanscodes.com.

Related posts