Jean-Christophe Napoleon Bonaparte and Countess Olympia von und zu Arco-Zinnerberg
Getty Images
For example, let’s take the tradition of marriage. Some people might consider the institution outdated and obsolete, an oppressive relic of past patriarchy. It could be argued that women are more financially independent today, working outside the home more often than at any point in time in history. They don’t need a man to ‘protect’ them.
Lots of people just live together with formal or informal agreements between the two parties. And with divorce so common, why bother with a wedding at all?
As far as children go, plenty of women raise children as single parents today. There’s no stigma to it. Employers are flexible and understanding.
Why not just ‘go with the flow’? Why, indeed.
The simplest answer is this: traditions have endured because they serve a purpose. They provide something of value to an individual and/or a society. Often, this value comes in the form of structure: a predictable and stable framework within which we can more productively enjoy our lives, take care of our loved ones, and accomplish our goals.
Regarding the tradition of marriage, we can point to the origins of the institution: as a safe way for families to preserve and transfer wealth. Brides sometimes came with a dowry. The prospects or position of the groom were a substantial consideration. A ‘good match’ was a priority for both families. Love was, let’s face it, an afterthought.
And while I am just as much of a romantic as the next person, I am also a realist: having common values and goals is just as important as passion when it comes to the enduring success of a marriage.
My point, however, is that marriage–like other traditions–is there for a reason. An easy exercise is to look at what happens when the tradition is not given proper consideration or abandoned altogether.
Look at societies or socioeconomic groups who don’t prioritize marriage. Less wealth is created and preserved. Less of it is passed on to the next generation. Speaking of the next generation, of course more children will be born out of wedlock. I care less about how this looks (I don’t live in some modern version of Downton Abbey.) I care more about the realities that follow.
Women are more likely to become the single, primary care-giving parent. The odds of unmarried mothers falling into poverty are substantial. Men are more likely to stagnate and struggle financially (think child support). Any wealth that was being built together is now divided by at least two, frequently dissipated, and often destroyed (think legal fees).